In previous videos, we have described in detail the peculiarities of writing the sections of a scientific article according to the IMRAD structure, in particular, the “Introduction”, “Methods”, and “Results”. Today, we are going to focus on the “Discussion” section, the final part of a scientific article, where the author explains the significance of the results of his or her research. That is why it should be written with great responsibility. What should be taken into account?
Our channel has a new video in which Pavlo Kolomiets, an expert at the Scientific and educational centre of “Scientific Publications”, explains in detail:
- Why is the “Discussion” section so important?
- How to analyse research results correctly?
- What structure should the “Discussion” section have?
- What are the common mistakes made by authors?
- How to make this section convincing for reviewers?
Enjoy the video!
Do you want to be among the first to know about new useful videos? Subscribe to our YouTube channel and follow the latest science news!
Do you need help with publishing a scientific article in Scopus or Web of Science? Then contact “Scientific Publications”! Our specialists provide comprehensive support at all stages of work: from article audit and journal search to the direct publication of the research. Would you like to get a free consultation? Leave your contact details in the form below, and our manager will contact you as soon as possible. Together to new scientific achievements!
